The Entry below was posted by Felice Anthony Visceglia on Monday 4/17/06 on The Law.Com 10:39 am (as explained in Lawsuit) Docket# L-000238-07)

Entry posted on the law.com on 4-17-06 (10:39 am): Entry was made by Defendant Anthony Visceglia: Plaintiff name was used deliberatly (according to Lawsuit/Complaint.

** The defendant has never disputed nor replied to the allegations listed in the Lawsuit/Complaint.................

Thread Tools
Thread#8081....Date 4/17/06..(IP :)..XXX-XXXXX-XX..Orig.....10:39 AM..email-XXXXX ..Posts..1..(patrickjscp)..THE LAW.COM ADMINISTRATOR HAS CLOSED THE THREAD TO FUTURE POSTINGS..................

Display Modes
THREAD CLOSED BY THE LAW.COM ADMINISTRATOR........................................

The Following Entry was posted by defendant, Felice Anthony Visceglia on 4/17/06 at exactly 10:39 am est......................(as explained on Page #2 and #3 of Lawsuit/Complaint)....... Defendant Visceglia used Plaintiff's name in this entry. 1/18/07): Portions of post are displayed below)...Docket# L-000-238-07:#1

04-17-2006, 10:39 AM
patrickjscp


Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
My Profile


Slander And Libel
xxxxxxxxxxxxx over a loan xxx has not paid me back on. In small claims court she told my vice president of my company that I am a covicted child molester and if she has children she should keep them away from me. She said this to her in the hallway outside the court room two times on two diffrent dates.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
company being myself. Is a convicted child molester can I sue her for slander and libel?



Defendant also made entries in his My space.com Blog (on February 4, 2006). The February 4, 2006 My space Blog entry is not displayed on this (www.myspace.com/ url..xxxxxx) site..............However, the entries posted were Defamatory and False. Referring to acts of molestation and clearly identified the Plaintiff in this case. This particular entry was published and read by others. Those in which received Defendants Visceglia's bulliten from his my space account................. In some circumstances a person can be charged criminally for posting this kind of material.

PATRICK RAPACCHIANO V ANTHONY VISCEGLIA: SETTLEMENT REACHED IN DEFAMATION CASE:

Order to Commerce bank NJ: To turn over funds Frozen in Defendant Visceglia's account since 8/24/07: Defendant agreed to turn over funds as part of the settlement agreement: defendant's signature is present on this document:

Settlement Agreement page (1) Rapacchiano V Visceglia: Defendant Visceglia must pay agreed amount and case will be filed as Settled: Docket L-000238-07:

Page (2) Rapacchiano V Visceglia: if defendant Defaults on Settlement Agreement: Judgment amount will be increased and Wage Garnishment will be re-instated.

Settlement Page (3) Rapacchiano V Visceglia: Docket L-000238-07: Wage garnishment will be held until Settlement is paid in full by Defendant Anthony Visceglia.

Settlement Page (4)

Settlement page (5) Rapacchiano V Visceglia:

Settlement Agreement Page (6): Contains signatures of both Plaintiff and defendant Anthony Visceglia along with two witnesses to signature. Upon satisfaction of payment of settlement: A satisfaction of Judgment will be filed with the Courts. Lien will be removed from defendants property.

WRIT OF WAGE EXECUTION ISSUED AND SERVED TO DEFENDANTS EMPLOYER COMMERCE INSURANCE SERVICES, CHERRY HILL NEW JERSEY: 10% OF ANTHONY VISCEGLIA'S GROSS PAY WILL GO TO PLAINTIFF TO SATISFY DEBT. EMPLOYER MUST HONOR A COURT ORDER. CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT.

UPDATE ON CASE # L-000238-07: ANTHONY VISCEGLIA, DEFENDANT (AKA) FELICE VISCEGLIA: JUDGMENT ENTERED 2/28/07: WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED AGAINST DEFENDANT: GOOD ASSETS MAY BE SEIZED TO SATISFY JUDGMENT: ALL WRITS AND GARNISHMENTS ETC ARE HANDLED THROUGH THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY ALONG WITH THE CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: ALL WRITS, GARNISHMENTS ETC ARE SERVED BY THE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. THIS INFORMATION IS ALL PUBLIC RECORD.

JASON LOMAX, ESQUIRE, IS NEW COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF IN THIS MATTER.

Patrick J Rapacchiano (Plaintiff) V. Felice Anthony Visceglia (Defendant)- L-000-238-07:

Actual Court Documents/ lawsuit/ Anthony Visceglia (aka) Felice A Visceglia/ Defamation/ DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED 2/28/07. RECORDED AS A LIEN

Anthony (Felice) Visceglia, Defendant: Lawsuit/Complaint: Defamation Action: Patrick Rapacchiano (Plaintiff) L-00023807

LAW OFFICES
DAVID A. AVEDISSIAN, ESQ., LLC
135 Kings Highway East Haddonfield, New Jersey 08033 (856) 857-1901 Attorney for Plaintiff

PATRICK J. RAPACCHIANO
Plaintiff,
v.
FELICE ANTHONY VISCEGLIA, Defendant.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN COUNTY
LAW DIVISION, CIVIL PART DOCKET NO.: L-00023807
COMPLAINT, DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL, DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

Plaintiff, Patrick J. Rapacchiano, by way of Complaint against Defendant, Felice Anthony Visceglia, hereby avers as follows:
COUNT ONE - DEFAMATION
1. Plaintiff is and at all times material hereto an adult individual residing at the above address. Plaintiff has at all times enjoyed a good name and reputation in the community in which he resides.
2. Defendant, Felice Anthony Visceglia is an adult
individual residing at 715 Jefferson Drive, Blackwood, New Jersey 08012.
3. Plaintiff and defendant became acquainted through their mutual employment during or about June 2002.
4. This employment relationship resulted in a friendship between the parties which lasted beyond their working relationship.

5. During the coarse of their friendship, plaintiff advanced money loans to defendant in reliance of defendant's promise to repay all monies extended in full.
6. Specifically, the defendant borrowed a total sum of $2,205.00 from plaintiff from November 2003 through May 2005.
7. Defendant Visceglia demonstrated threatening and
verbally abusive behavior toward the Plaintiff on more than one occasion during the friendship. Mr. Visceglia's behavior at times was unpredictable, assaultive and irrational, evoking fear in plaintiff. As a result, plaintiff was forced to remove himself from the company of Mr. Visceglia and ultimately end the friendship.
8. Defendant has brazenly failed to repay any of the monies lent to him by plaintiff despite numerous requests by plaintiff for repayment.
9. On or about February 4, 2006, defendant made entries in his Personal blog, identifying plaintiff as a "child Molester." This blog was then published for third persons to view.
10. During or about April 17, 2006, plaintiff again requested that defendant repay the monies which were borrowed from him. By that point, the parties' friendship had already disintegrated,
11. In response to plaintiff's April 17, 2006 request for repayment, defendant posted a message on a public internet forum "The Law.Com" using plaintiff's name. The entry posted by




defendant Felice Anthony Visceglia, falsely accuses plaintiff of committing an act of child molestation.
12. In addition, prior to the April 17, 2006 internet posting, Mr. Viscelgia had made entries in his personal internet blog in which said defendant deliberately made false statements identifying plaintiff as a child molester. Defendant then published these statements to those who have access to his blog on the internet.
13. Plaintiff was made aware of these communications when he saw the blog entry, which was published to third persons and accessible to all who have internet capabilities.
14. The blog entry written by defendant Felice Anthony Visceglia on behalf of plaintiff was made by defendant with his specific knowledge of the falsity of same.
15. The defamatory contents of the subject blog speaks for as to criminal conduct allegedly committed by plaintiff.
16. Plaintiff has never committed any of the criminal acts which are alleged by defendant in the blog entry of April 17, 2006.
17. Defendant knew that the contents of its correspondence were libelous and false or entertained serious doubt as to the truth of the statements in the letters, and as a result of the false and misleading information contained therein, Plaintiff has been held up to ridicule, Plaintiff's credit has been impaired and Plaintiff's reputation has been greatly injured.



18. Defendant, in disseminating such information to the public, acted in a grossly irresponsible manner with reckless disregard for the standards of truth and veracity ordinarily followed by responsible persons and Defendants knew in making thi statements that a false impression would be made and that Plaintiff would be damaged. Defendant published these statements: intentionally and/or with malice in an effort to discredit, malign and impugn the honesty and integrity of Plaintiff, all to Plaintiff's damage.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for damages, including both compensatory and punitive damages, for costs of suit and counsel fees and for such other relief as may be just.
COUNT TWO - BREACH OF CONTRACT
1. Plaintiff repeats each and every allegation set forth in Count One of the Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
2. Defendant has failed to repay plaintiff any of the monies; which he borrowed, all to Plaintiff's damage.
3. As a result, there is a clear breach of contract committed by defendant.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for: damages, including both compensatory and punitive damages, for costs of suit and counsel fees and for such other relief as may be just and equitable.
COUNT THREE - UNJUST ENRICHMENT




1. Plaintiff repeats each and every allegation set forth in Count One of the Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
2. Defendant has failed to repay plaintiff any of the monies which he borrowed, all to Plaintiff's damage.
3. As a result, defendant has been unjustly enriched, to plaintiff's damage.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against defendant for damages, including both compensatory and punitive damages, for costs of suit and counsel fees and for such other relief as may be just and equitable.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO R. 4:5-1
Plaintiff, by his attorney, hereby certifies that the matte in controversy is not the subject of any other pending or contemplated judicial or arbitration proceeding. Plaintiff is no currently aware of any other parties that should be joined in this action.
DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL
Pursuant to R. 4:25-4, plaintiff designates David Avedissian Esquire, as trial counsel in this matter.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury.
David A. Avedissian, Esquire Attorney for Plaintiff